Open to internships · analytics, data & software

From raw data to shipped product.

Senior in Business Analytics & AI at UT Dallas, focused on data and business-analyst work. I turn raw data into decisions — SQL, statistics, and ML on real datasets, each project below ending in a quantified business call. Along the way I founded and shipped BizFalcon AI solo — a live analytics SaaS where I build agentic AI that recommends the next move and waits for approval.

Selected work

SQL, statistics, ML — and a shipped AI SaaS.

Every project runs on real data and ends in a decision: revenue at risk, a lift, a segment to target, a forecast to act on.

01 · Founder — shipped SaaSLive

BizFalcon AI

A SaaS company I founded and built solo, end to end: React + TypeScript frontends, a Firebase backend (Auth, Firestore, Cloud Functions), Stripe billing, CI, and production deploys. Two paid products sit on one engine: ProfitFalcon for e-commerce unit economics, and ClientFalcon for the agencies running other people’s accounts. A fourth, Fledge, does the same for creator analytics. Underneath all of them, BizFalcon Analyst is the shared engine and the free way in — it writes and runs Python on your full dataset in the browser, every number computed rather than estimated, with the formula behind each figure one click away. On top sits an agentic layer: deterministic AI playbooks that watch business data, recommend the exact next move with projected $ impact, wait for human approval, then score every decision against what actually happened in a ledger. The direction — turn hours of manual analysis into reviewed, one-click actions, cutting the analyst bottleneck for teams too lean to hire one.

Founded & shipped solo Agentic playbooks · human-approved Decision→outcome ledger 3,600+ tests · CI

React · TypeScript · Firebase · Pyodide · OpenAI / Anthropic / Gemini · Stripe

02 · Customer analyticsSegmentation

Retail Customer Intelligence

Customer analytics on 802,712 real transactions (41 countries, £17.45M). K-means RFM segmentation into 4 tiers; a churn model scored out-of-sample at 0.796 ROC-AUC against a 55.3% base rate. The retention call list is sized with a precision@k curve — top 100 are 90% real churners — and a cost model that shows capacity, not contact cost, is the binding constraint. Apriori rules lift 24×.

Precision@k curve from the retail churn dashboard: precision falls from 90% at the top 100 contacts toward the 55.3% base rate as the list grows.

Precision@k on 1,047 held-out customers · top 100 are 90% churners

Python · Scikit-learn · Pandas · RFM

03 · SQLBusiness intelligence

Olist E-Commerce Analysis

End-to-end BI on 96,478 real Brazilian e-commerce orders — 9 source tables joined into a star-schema flat table, then analysed in SQLite with CTEs and window functions. Health & Beauty leads at R$1.4M of R$15.4M; at order grain, deliveries past 21 days average 3.01★ against 4.41★ for sub-7-day ones. A logistic regression controlling for state, category and freight puts a one-week delivery slip at 1.78× the odds of a ≤3-star review (OR 1.085/day, CI 1.083–1.088, n=95,824) — the adjusted effect is stronger than the raw one, so confounders were masking it. Published as a live Tableau dashboard.

Delivery speed versus customer rating from the Olist dashboard, at order grain: 4.41 stars for deliveries under 7 days falling to 3.01 stars beyond 21 days.

Delivery speed vs rating, order grain · 4.41★ → 3.01★

SQL · Python · Tableau · Pandas · Excel

04 · Predictive MLCalibrated

NBA Game Outcome Model

A model trained on 10,624 real games across nine seasons, then tested on a season it had never seen: 66.4% accuracy against 54.4% for always picking the home team. It only ever trains on earlier games to predict later ones, so no future information leaks in, and the output is tuned so a stated ‘70% chance’ happens about 70% of the time. Then I checked whether the features earned their place: one team-strength rating nearly matches all 71 on its own, and the difference is smaller than the model’s own run-to-run variation — so the extra 70 improve the honesty of the probabilities, not the picks. A further test on the following season, 1,230 games chosen after every design decision was already made, held up and reached the same conclusion. Games from the 2020 bubble are down-weighted, because home advantage measurably collapsed that year.

Chart from the NBA dashboard comparing how well each feature set ranks games: always picking the home team sits at the bottom, a single team-strength rating alone reaches almost the full score, and all 71 features add very little on top of it.

Holdout AUC by feature set · Elo alone 0.7098 vs 0.7250

Python · HistGradientBoosting · Optuna · SQLite

05 · Data vizWebGL

Cosmos Deep Field

An interactive 3D map where every point is a real object someone measured — 10,202,358 in the catalogue: 6,786,069 Gaia DR3 stars, 2,656,968 SDSS and 2MRS galaxies, 752,910 SDSS quasars and 6,411 NASA exoplanet host stars, plus the cosmic web as 260,178 filament segments (Tempel et al. 2014). Nothing is generated or decorative. Five sky-survey APIs feed a Python pipeline; Astropy turns parallax or redshift into 3D positions. Each point is quantized to 8 bytes and streamed through an octree LOD drawing about 1.8M per frame. Layers sit on their own shells, so distances between them are presentational. The public build streams 4,616,289 of those points — the full 6.79M Gaia tier is a 54 MB file that is not committed, so the viewer ships a 1.2M-star tier in its place. Fly it with WASD.

Live render from the Cosmos Deep Field viewer: Gaia stars and quasars around a bright core with the blue filaments of the SDSS cosmic web threading through them.

6,786,069 stars · 2,656,968 galaxies · 752,910 quasars · 6,411 exo hosts · +260,178 filament segments · 10,202,358 measured · 4,616,289 served

Python · Astropy · Three.js · Pandas

Skills

SQL, statistics, and applied ML.

Data & SQL

  • SQL — joins · CTEs · window fns
  • Data cleaning
  • Excel

Statistics & Experimentation

  • Hypothesis testing
  • A/B testing
  • Regression
  • Cohort analysis

Machine Learning

  • Classification
  • Churn / segmentation
  • Model evaluation

Visualization

  • Tableau
  • Chart.js
  • Power BI (familiar)

Engineering

  • Python / pandas
  • React / TypeScript
  • Firebase
  • LLM integration

Stack

The tools behind the work.

Languages

  • Python
  • SQL
  • TypeScript
  • HTML / JS
  • Familiar with R

Libraries

  • Pandas · NumPy
  • Scikit-learn
  • statsmodels
  • HistGBM · Optuna
  • Chart.js

Tools & AI

  • Tableau · Power BI (familiar)
  • Excel · Git
  • Firebase
  • OpenAI · Anthropic · Gemini
  • Pyodide

About

Analytics that connects to the business, not just the numbers.

Senior at UT Dallas building end-to-end data products — from SQL (joins, CTEs, window functions) and cleaning raw datasets to deploying interactive dashboards and shipping full-stack AI products to production — with a focus on measurable business impact.

My concentration in Marketing & AI suits roles where the analysis has to connect to customer behavior and strategy. I'm especially interested in applied AI for analytics — turning manual reporting into reviewed, one-click workflows. Based in Leander, TX; seeking data or business analytics internships for summer 2027.

5 live projects1M+ rows analysed400+ automated tests1 shipped company
EducationDec 2027

B.S. Business Analytics & AI

Concentration · Marketing & AI

University of Texas at Dallas
Naveen Jindal School of Management
Anticipated December 2027


Contact